Stop says the red light
Go says the green
Wait says the yellow light
twinkling in between.
Some folks have some v. definitive takes on RLCs (red-light cameras). The following is one set of pros v. cons...

I don't want my picture taken for the general populace to goggle over! This is an all-out rights-to-privacy issue. I want to be able to pick my nose and scratch what itches without some cubicle-cop giving me the once-over on a monitor somewhere. There ARE still some rights in this country that've not been abdicated! "Pi*s-sticks on all RLCs!"
The RLC device is only activated when someone runs a red-light;
otherwise it is a stoic bit of tackle. The proofs are very clear, though,
otherwise it is a stoic bit of tackle. The proofs are very clear, though,
that RLCs have reduced right-angle wrecking incidents by 40 percentage points.
And increased rear-end incidents!


All this is just an instance of being sweated yet again by Big Brother. Must we bow to the likes of insurance companies' actuarials and police statistics? We all know that this is a strike at basic civil rights along with an obvious ploy to rake in more and bigger bucks for politic! Why the big deal if a red light is run? That's what police are for--not some AI camera. I want my privacy! And I should have it in my own car!
Being in the confines of one's own car is a private spot,
but once a private car is in the public domain--i.e., highways and intersections--it (and the driver) must abide by the dictates and laws of the land (check out the Texas Driver's Handbook).
Yes, millions of dollars have been extirpated from villainous red-light runners (2.4 million in Austin, 95 million in Texas). Those monies, after payment for and maintenance of the devices, are dispensed onward to budget deficits and school subsidies.



No comments:
Post a Comment